Search for: All records

ABSTRACT The Great Valley forearc (GVf) basin, California, records deposition along the western margin of North America during active oceanic subduction from Jurassic through Paleogene time. Along the western GVf, its underlying basement, the Coast Range Ophiolite (CRO), is exposed as a narrow outcrop belt. CRO segments are overlain by the Great Valley Group (GVG), and locally, an ophiolitic breccia separates the CRO from basal GVG strata. New stratigraphic, petrographic, and geochronologic data (3865 detrital and 68 igneous zircon U-Pb ages) from the upper CRO, ophiolitic breccia, and basal GVG strata clarify temporal relationships among the three units, constrain maximum depositional ages (MDAs), and identify provenance signatures of the ophiolitic breccia and basal GVG strata. Gabbroic rocks from the upper CRO yield zircon U-Pb ages of 168.0 ± 1.3 Ma and 165.1 ± 1.2 Ma. Prominent detrital-zircon age populations of the ophiolitic breccia and GVG strata comprise Jurassic and Jurassic–Early Cretaceous ages, respectively, with pre-Mesozoic ages in both that are consistent with sources of North America affinity. Combined with petrographic modal analyses that show abundant volcanic grains (> 50%), we interpret the breccia to be mainly derived from the underlying CRO, with limited input from the hinterland of North America, and the basal GVG to be derived from Mesozoic igneous and volcanic rocks of the Sierra Nevada–Klamath magmatic arc and hinterland. Analysis of detrital-zircon grains from the lower and upper ophiolitic breccia yields MDAs of ∼ 166 Ma and ∼ 151 Ma, respectively. Along-strike variation in Jurassic and Cretaceous MDAs from basal GVG strata range from ∼ 148 to 141 Ma, which are interpreted to reflect diachronous deposition in segmented depocenters during early development of the forearc. The ophiolitic breccia was deposited in a forearc position proximal to North America < 4 Myr before the onset of GVG deposition. A new tectonic model for early development of the GVf highlights the role of forearc extension coeval with magmatic arc compression during the earliest stages of basin development. 

ABSTRACT The Great Valley forearc (GVf) basin, California, records deposition along the western margin of North America during active oceanic subduction from Jurassic through Paleogene time. Along the western GVf, its underlying basement, the Coast Range Ophiolite (CRO), is exposed as a narrow outcrop belt. CRO segments are overlain by the Great Valley Group (GVG), and locally, an ophiolitic breccia separates the CRO from basal GVG strata. New stratigraphic, petrographic, and geochronologic data (3865 detrital and 68 igneous zircon U-Pb ages) from the upper CRO, ophiolitic breccia, and basal GVG strata clarify temporal relationships among the three units, constrain maximum depositional ages (MDAs), and identify provenance signatures of the ophiolitic breccia and basal GVG strata. Gabbroic rocks from the upper CRO yield zircon U-Pb ages of 168.0 ± 1.3 Ma and 165.1 ± 1.2 Ma. Prominent detrital-zircon age populations of the ophiolitic breccia and GVG strata comprise Jurassic and Jurassic–Early Cretaceous ages, respectively, with pre-Mesozoic ages in both that are consistent with sources of North America affinity. Combined with petrographic modal analyses that show abundant volcanic grains (> 50%), we interpret the breccia to be mainly derived from the underlying CRO, with limited input from the hinterland of North America, and the basal GVG to be derived from Mesozoic igneous and volcanic rocks of the Sierra Nevada–Klamath magmatic arc and hinterland. Analysis of detrital-zircon grains from the lower and upper ophiolitic breccia yields MDAs of ∼ 166 Ma and ∼ 151 Ma, respectively. Along-strike variation in Jurassic and Cretaceous MDAs from basal GVG strata range from ∼ 148 to 141 Ma, which are interpreted to reflect diachronous deposition in segmented depocenters during early development of the forearc. The ophiolitic breccia was deposited in a forearc position proximal to North America < 4 Myr before the onset of GVG deposition. A new tectonic model for early development of the GVf highlights the role of forearc extension coeval with magmatic arc compression during the earliest stages of basin development. 

Abstract Archean rocks exposed in the Beartooth Mountains, Montana and Wyoming, have experienced a complex >2.5 Gyr thermal history related to the long‐term geodynamic evolution of Laurentia. We constrain this history using “deep‐time” thermochronology, reporting zircon U‐Pb, biotite⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar, and zircon and apatite [U‐Th(‐Sm)]/He results from three transects across the basement‐core of the range. Our central transect yielded a zircon U‐Pb concordia age of 2,805.6 ± 6.4 Ma. Biotite⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar plateau ages from western samples are ≤1,775 ± 27 Ma, while those from samples further east are ≥2,263 ± 76 Ma. Zircon (U‐Th)/He dates span 686.4 ± 11.9 to 13.5 ± 0.3 Ma and show a negative relationship with effective uranium—a proxy for radiation damage. Apatite (U‐Th)/He dates are 109.2 ± 23.9 to 43.6 ± 1.9 Ma and correlate with sample elevation. Multi‐chronometer Bayesian time‐temperature inversions suggest: (a) Cooling between ∼1.90 and ∼1.80 Ga, likely related to Big Sky orogeny thermal effects; (b) Reheating between ∼1.80 Ga and ∼1.35 Ga consistent with Mesoproterozoic burial; (c) Cooling to ≤100°C between Mesoproterozoic and early Paleozoic time, likely reflecting continental erosion; (d) Variable Paleozoic–Jurassic cooling, possibly related to Paleozoic tectonism and/or low eustatic sea level; (e) Rapid Cretaceous–Paleocene cooling, preceding accepted proxies for flat‐slab subduction; (f) Eocene–Miocene reheating consistent with reburial by Cenozoic volcanics and/or sediments; (g) Post‐20 Ma cooling consistent with Neogene development of topographic relief. Our results emphasize the utility of multi‐chronometer thermochronology in recovering complex, non‐monotonic multi‐billion‐year thermal histories.